Prediction of Mario Tupy vs Maniel Bains Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Tupy vs M. Bains

Mario Tupy

AUT

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Maniel Bains

GBR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Tupy 2 - 0 Bains

They have played 6 sets in total, with Mario Tupy winning 4 and Maniel Bains winning 2. The last match between Mario Tupy and Maniel Bains was at the Nigeria F1, 18-02-2008, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mario Tupy getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tupy	2
Bains	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) Nigeria F1(02-18-08)

Stats

Mario Tupy

Maniel Bains

(R2) Sudan F1(11-26-07)

Stats

Mario Tupy

Maniel Bains

M. Tupy vs M. Bains H2H Profile

M. Tupy	Stats	M. Bains
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
30.95% (13-29)	Career Total W/L	34.52% (29-55)
1	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Tupy vs M. Bains Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mario Tupy has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Maniel Bains has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mario Tupy, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maniel Bains has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mario Tupy has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maniel Bains has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mario Tupy has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Maniel Bains winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mario Tupy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 28% (W/L 9/23). Maniel Bains has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 10/13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Mario Tupy has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Maniel Bains has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mario Tupy winning 2 times and Maniel Bains being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Mario Tupy winning 4 and Maniel Bains winning 2.
The last match between Mario Tupy and Maniel Bains was at the Nigeria F1, 18-02-2008, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mario Tupy getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mario Tupy has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Maniel Bains has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mario Tupy has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maniel Bains has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mario Tupy has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maniel Bains has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mario Tupy vs Maniel Bains Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Tupy vs M. Bains H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Tupy	Stats	M. Bains
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	2
35	Games Won	20
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Tupy Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bytom Challenger - 15-06-2009
Q1 Pavel ChekhovP. Chekhov	W	4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3)	Stats
Q2 Adrian SikoraA. Sikora	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Slovenia F2 - 01-06-2009
R1 Frank WintermantelF. Wintermantel	L	4-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Panama F1 - 09-02-2009
R1 Gonzalo TurG. Tur	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Mexico F1 - 26-01-2009
R1 Matthew S RobertsM. S	L	7-6(4) 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Bains Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Egypt F38 - 02-11-2015
Q3 Mason RecciM. Recci	L	5-0 ret.	Stats
Q2 Gil Uwe GrundG. Uwe	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
Egypt F37 - 26-10-2015
Q3 Marc DijkhuizenM. Dijkhuizen	L	1-6 6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Omar AbdoO. Abdo	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
Egypt F36 - 19-10-2015
R1 Karol DrzewieckiK. Drzewiecki	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Tupy vs M. Bains Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Tupy	Stats	M. Bains
30.95% (13/29)	YTD Win/Loss	34.52% (29/55)
32.29% (31/65)	Sets Win/Loss	39.04% (73/114)
43.90% (396/506)	Games Win/Loss	44.73% (730/902)
40.00% (4/6)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (14/28)
28.13% (9/23)	Clay Win/Loss	43.48% (10/13)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	31.25% (5/11)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
0	Aces Total	3
0	Total Double Faults	2
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
355.24	Average Opponent Rank	284.57
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	44% (27/62)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	56% (15/27)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (16/35)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	29% (12/41)
40.00% (2/3)	Challenger W/L	25.00% (1/3)
29.73% (11/26)	Futures W/L	35.00% (28/52)
29% (12/41)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	35% (28/80)
36% (5/14)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	64% (7/11)
54% (7/13)	Deciding Set Win %	30% (7/23)
60% (15/9)	1st Set Won, Won Match	69% (36/25)
40% (15/6)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	31% (36/11)
15% (27/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (48/4)